. Maruti defends stand on good conduct bond

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd (MSIL), on 1.12.2011, quashed allegations that demanding a good conduct bond from workers was an unfair labour practice even as it remained evasive on details of the severance packages doled out to the 30 workers who resigned from the company in November, 2011. The government had, on 29.11.2011, rapped Maruti for making workers sign the good conduct bond in August before they were allowed to enter the factory. The bond became a key issue between the workers and the Management and led to a near 3 month long labour strike at the factory. 4 JOURNAL SECTION LLR January, 2012 – 16 “The good conduct bonds are strictly in compliance with the standing orders of the company, which have been certified by the Haryana government”, said R C Bhargava, chairman, MSIL. “We have followed exactly what it stipulated and I am not sure why it is unfair, how something which is legally certified becomes an unfair practice.” Workers had been demanding formation of an independent union at the factory and Maruti had alleged that workers deliberately delayed production and tampered with the equipment before insisting on the bond.


About labour law reporter

monthly magazine on labour laws in India

Posted on January 25, 2012, in News and views and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: